WK Wasp 50 TTR vs PGO B2 50 (2017)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the WK Wasp 50 TTRstacks up against the PGO B2 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | WK Wasp 50 TTR | PGO B2 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2017 | 2016 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | 5 Nm | 4 Nm |
| Weight | — | 103 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | 1.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 130/60-12 / 130/60-12 | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
WK Wasp 50 TTR vs PGO B2 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the WK Wasp 50 TTR and the PGO B2 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the WK Wasp 50 TTR brings 4 hp, while the PGO B2 50 counters with 3 hp at 103 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: