WT Motors Bilbao 50 vs Kymco Sento (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the WT Motors Bilbao 50stacks up against the Kymco Sento. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | WT Motors Bilbao 50 | Kymco Sento |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 4 hp |
| Torque | 3 Nm | — |
| Weight | 105 kg | 89 kg |
| Seat height | 27 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.1 L | 1.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 | 90/90-10 / 90/90-10 |
WT Motors Bilbao 50 vs Kymco Sento — which should you buy?
Picking between the WT Motors Bilbao 50 and the Kymco Sento usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the WT Motors Bilbao 50 brings 3 hp in a 105 kg package, while the Kymco Sento counters with 4 hp at 89 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: