Xispa EnduCross 50 vs Beta RR Enduro 50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Xispa EnduCross 50stacks up against the Beta RR Enduro 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Xispa EnduCross 50 | Beta RR Enduro 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 5 hp | — |
| Weight | — | 85 kg |
| Seat height | 29 mm | 36 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 1-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | — | 80/90-21 / 110/80-18 |
Xispa EnduCross 50 vs Beta RR Enduro 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Xispa EnduCross 50 and the Beta RR Enduro 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Xispa EnduCross 50 brings 5 hp, while the Beta RR Enduro 50 counters with its own power figure at 85 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: