Xispa EnduCross 50x4t X1 vs Lem Recreational CX3 (2008)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Xispa EnduCross 50x4t X1stacks up against the Lem Recreational CX3. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Xispa EnduCross 50x4t X1 | Lem Recreational CX3 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2008 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 5 hp | 3 hp |
| Weight | — | 45 kg |
| Seat height | 29 mm | 29 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 0.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | 1-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
Xispa EnduCross 50x4t X1 vs Lem Recreational CX3 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Xispa EnduCross 50x4t X1 and the Lem Recreational CX3 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Xispa EnduCross 50x4t X1 brings 5 hp, while the Lem Recreational CX3 counters with 3 hp at 45 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: