Yamaha Aerox Naked vs PGO B2 50 (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Yamaha Aerox Nakedstacks up against the PGO B2 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Yamaha Aerox Naked | PGO B2 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2016 | 2016 |
| Price | $2,795 | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | 4 Nm | 4 Nm |
| Weight | — | 103 kg |
| Seat height | 32 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.9 L | 1.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 130/60-13 / 140/60-13 | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
Yamaha Aerox Naked vs PGO B2 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Yamaha Aerox Naked and the PGO B2 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Yamaha Aerox Naked brings 3 hp, while the PGO B2 50 counters with 3 hp at 103 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: