Yamaha Aerox R vs WK Wasp 50 TTR (2017)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Yamaha Aerox Rstacks up against the WK Wasp 50 TTR. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Yamaha Aerox R | WK Wasp 50 TTR |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2017 | 2017 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 4 hp |
| Torque | 4 Nm | 5 Nm |
| Seat height | 32 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.9 L | 1.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic. | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic. | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 130/60-13 / 140/60-13 | 130/60-12 / 130/60-12 |
Yamaha Aerox R vs WK Wasp 50 TTR — which should you buy?
Picking between the Yamaha Aerox R and the WK Wasp 50 TTR usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Yamaha Aerox R brings 3 hp, while the WK Wasp 50 TTR counters with 4 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: