Yamaha BWs NG vs Clipic QT9 49 (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Yamaha BWs NGstacks up against the Clipic QT9 49. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Yamaha BWs NG | Clipic QT9 49 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | — |
| Torque | 4 Nm | — |
| Weight | — | 85 kg |
| Seat height | 32 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.7 L | 1.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/90-10 / 130/90-10 | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
Yamaha BWs NG vs Clipic QT9 49 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Yamaha BWs NG and the Clipic QT9 49 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Yamaha BWs NG brings 4 hp, while the Clipic QT9 49 counters with its own power figure at 85 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: