Yamaha FZR 250 vs James L25 Commodore (1988)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Yamaha FZR 250stacks up against the James L25 Commodore. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Yamaha FZR 250 | James L25 Commodore |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 1988 | 1962 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 250 cc | 250 cc |
| Horsepower | 45 hp | — |
| Torque | 25 Nm | — |
| Weight | 141 kg | — |
| Seat height | 30 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 3.2 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc. 4-piston calipers | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. 2-piston calipers | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 100/80-17 52H / 120/80-17 61H | — |
Yamaha FZR 250 vs James L25 Commodore — which should you buy?
Picking between the Yamaha FZR 250 and the James L25 Commodore usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Yamaha FZR 250 brings 45 hp in a 141 kg package, while the James L25 Commodore counters with its own power figure.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: