Yamaha Grizzly 450 Auto 4x4 IRS vs Arctic Cat XC 450 (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Yamaha Grizzly 450 Auto 4x4 IRSstacks up against the Arctic Cat XC 450. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Yamaha Grizzly 450 Auto 4x4 IRS | Arctic Cat XC 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2016 |
| Price | $7,149 | $7,699 |
| Engine | 421 cc | 443 cc |
| Weight | — | 272 kg |
| Seat height | 34 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 4.0 L | 4.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Double disc | Single disc. Hydraulic. |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Hydraulic. |
| Tires | 25/8-AT12 / 25/10-AT12 | 23/8-12 / 23/10-12 |
Yamaha Grizzly 450 Auto 4x4 IRS vs Arctic Cat XC 450 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Yamaha Grizzly 450 Auto 4x4 IRS and the Arctic Cat XC 450 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Yamaha Grizzly 450 Auto 4x4 IRS brings its published horsepower, while the Arctic Cat XC 450 counters with its own power figure at 272 kg. On price, the Yamaha Grizzly 450 Auto 4x4 IRS has the lower MSRP.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: