Yamaha Neos 4T vs Vento Zip r3i Turbocam (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Yamaha Neos 4Tstacks up against the Vento Zip r3i Turbocam. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Yamaha Neos 4T | Vento Zip r3i Turbocam |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2013 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 5 hp |
| Torque | 3 Nm | 9 Nm |
| Weight | — | 65 kg |
| Seat height | 31 mm | 29 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.4 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. ABS |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 100/60-12 / 100/60-12 |
Yamaha Neos 4T vs Vento Zip r3i Turbocam — which should you buy?
Picking between the Yamaha Neos 4T and the Vento Zip r3i Turbocam usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Yamaha Neos 4T brings 3 hp, while the Vento Zip r3i Turbocam counters with 5 hp at 65 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: