Arctic Cat TRV 700 S GT vs KSR Explorer Urano 750 EFI 4x4 (2017)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Arctic Cat TRV 700 S GTstacks up against the KSR Explorer Urano 750 EFI 4x4. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Arctic Cat TRV 700 S GT | KSR Explorer Urano 750 EFI 4x4 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2017 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 695 cc | 731 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 55 hp |
| Torque | — | 68 Nm |
| Weight | 328 kg | 326 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 5.7 L | 6.1 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Double disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 25/8-12 / 25/10-12 | 26/8-14 / 26/10-14 |
Arctic Cat TRV 700 S GT vs KSR Explorer Urano 750 EFI 4x4 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Arctic Cat TRV 700 S GT and the KSR Explorer Urano 750 EFI 4x4 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Arctic Cat TRV 700 S GT brings its published horsepower in a 328 kg package, while the KSR Explorer Urano 750 EFI 4x4 counters with 55 hp at 326 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: