Beta RR 50 Racing Motard vs Factory Bike Chrono SM50-2 (2008)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Beta RR 50 Racing Motardstacks up against the Factory Bike Chrono SM50-2. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Beta RR 50 Racing Motard | Factory Bike Chrono SM50-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2008 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Weight | 85 kg | 82 kg |
| Seat height | 36 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.6 L | 2.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. AJP |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 110/80-17 / 130/70-17 | 100/80-17 / 130/70-18 |
Beta RR 50 Racing Motard vs Factory Bike Chrono SM50-2 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Beta RR 50 Racing Motard and the Factory Bike Chrono SM50-2 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Beta RR 50 Racing Motard brings its published horsepower in a 85 kg package, while the Factory Bike Chrono SM50-2 counters with its own power figure at 82 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: